Guardians of Elk Creek Old Growth v. Department of Forestry & Fire Protection

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 259·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 474·2001 Daily Journal DAR 6375·89 Cal. App. 4th 1431·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5197
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2001A088611California1,155 words

Opinion

Opinion

Parrilli, J.

In mandamus proceedings alleging failure to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the petitioner is required to request a hearing within 90 days of filing the petition. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21167.4, subd. (a).) In Dunn-Edwards Corp. v. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 644 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 850 ] (Dunn-Edwards), this court held that after a change of venue, the petitioner is excused from timely requesting a hearing if the trial court fails to give the statutorily required notice that the case has been transferred. (Dunn-Edwards, supra, 9 Cal.App.4th at p. 652 .) Here, a petitioner who did receive notice the case had been transferred contends the 90-day period was tolled under Dunn-Edwards during the change of venue process. We reject that claim. A petitioner with notice that transfer of the case is complete must comply with the time limit imposed by section 21167.4.

Petitioner below, Guardians of Elk Creek Old Growth, filed a mandamus petition in Sacramento County on May 3, 1999, to challenge the approval of a timber harvest plan. Real parties in interest Redwood Empire Sawmills and Pacific States Industries, Inc., moved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.