Shoup

People v. Shoup

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 468·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 478·2001 Daily Journal DAR 5202·89 Cal. App. 4th 420·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4253
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2001C033134California240 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellant Michelle Lynn Shoup appeals from Sacramento County action Nos. 98M09139 and 96F07655.

It appears that action No. 98M09139 was at all times a prosecution for misdemeanor offenses only, which resulted in misdemeanor convictions by a jury. Action No. 96F07655 was a proceeding to revoke probation in a felony case which was consolidated for hearing with action No. 98M09139. At the conclusion of the misdemeanor trial/probation revocation hearing, the trial court revoked probation based on its independent evaluation of the evidence.

This court is without jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal in action No. 98M09139; an appeal in said action must be taken to the appellate division of the superior court. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11; Pen. Code, § 1466.) The appeal from action No. 98M09139 is hereby dismissed.

The appeal from action No. 96F07655 remains properly pending in this court. However, the parties, in their briefs, have raised issues and cited law that apply to trials and not necessarily to probation revocation proceedings. All briefs of appellant and respondent are hereby stricken.

Appellant shall file, within 30 days, a new opening brief that raises issues, if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.