Salazar-Merino

People v. Salazar-Merino

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 313·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 402·2001 Daily Journal DAR 5313·89 Cal. App. 4th 590·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4361
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 2001A090898; A092314California3,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Horner, J.

Juan Salazar-Merino pled guilty to “using a false document to conceal his . . . true citizenship or resident alien status” in violation of Penal Code section 114, and was sentenced to five years in state prison, with probation denied. Appellant contends on appeal that: (1) his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by recommending a guilty plea without advising him of a possible defense to the charge; (2) section 114 is unconstitutional as applied to appellant because it failed to give adequate notice that the conduct in which he engaged violated the statute; (3) the area of conduct covered by section 114 is preempted by federal law; (4) section 114 is unconstitutional because it is not severable from the other provisions of Proposition 187, which were ruled unconstitutional; (5) section 114 violates substantive due process because it is not reasonably related to a proper legislative goal; (6) appellant’s sentence to five years in state prison constitutes cruel and unusual punishment; and (7) in denying appellant probation, the trial court failed to exercise its discretion, abused that discretion and/or violated appellant’s rights to due process and/or equal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.