Stanton Road Associates v. Pacific Employers Insurance

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 606·36 Cal. App. 4th 333·43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 1·95 Daily Journal DAR 8642·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5087
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1995Docket Nos. A060822, A064753California3,845 words

Opinion

Opinion

Corrigan, J.

Stanton Road Associates (Stanton), a limited partnership, appeals from two judgments entered after the trial court sustained the demurrers of three insurers without leave to amend and granted summary adjudication in favor of a fourth. We ordered the appeals consolidated and now affirm both judgments.

Background

This case involves a continuous property loss and claims made against multiple insurance companies that, concurrently or successively, provided first party property coverage for real property located at 860 Stanton Road in Burlingame. Stanton seeks to recover from defendant insurers damages caused by environmental contamination from an adjacent dry-cleaning plant.

At all times relevant until September 1986, the Stanton Road property was owned by the Curley Bates Company. The property was insured by three different insurers during that period: St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company (St. Paul) from April 1, 1983, through July 1, 1986; Integrity Insurance Company (Integrity) from July 1, 1983, through July 1, 1986; and United National Insurance Company (United National) from July 1, 1984, through July 1, 1986.

Stanton was formed and the Stanton Road property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.