Castaneda

Castaneda v. Bornstein

Caution
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 707·36 Cal. App. 4th 1818·43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 10·95 Daily Journal DAR 9034
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1995Docket Nos. B083779, B071822California4,044 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Plaintiff Kathryn Castaneda brought this medical malpractice action against the physicians who provided her with care and treatment before, during, and immediately after her birth. She alleged defendants’ negligence caused her to suffer brain damage which resulted in mental retardation. The trial court granted a nonsuit in favor of defendant Machikawa, the consulting “OB/GYN” and defendant Wang, a pediatrician who treated plaintiff immediately after her birth. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Bornstein, a family medicine specialist who provided the primary care during plaintiff’s gestation and performed an emergency cesarean delivery.

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold the trial court erred in excluding the testimony of plaintiff’s expert as to causation on the ground plaintiff had not provided an adequate narrative statement of the proposed testimony in her expert witness declaration. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of nonsuit as to Dr. Machikawa.

As to Dr. Wang, we hold the trial court properly granted a nonsuit on the ground this defendant was immune from liability under the physicians “Good Samaritan” statutes. Therefore, we affirm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.