Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Superior Court

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 593·36 Cal. App. 4th 275·42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 227·95 Daily Journal DAR 8832·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5047
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 1995A069092California1,193 words

Opinion

Opinion

In this case we hold that a trial court may order joinder of a personal injury action with a related uninsured motorist arbitration proceeding, where such joinder is necessary to prevent inconsistent rulings.

Real parties in interest Melissa and Ronald Louie are plaintiffs in a personal injury action against two motorists, each of whom rear-ended the Louies’ car in two separate accidents within a period of about four weeks. The driver of the second car was not insured. Real parties filed an uninsured motorist (U/M) claim with their insurer, petitioner Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company. That claim is now in arbitration. Melissa Louie injured her lower back in both accidents. In order to avoid inconsistent rulings regarding the comparative fault of the two drivers, real parties petitioned the superior court to join the arbitration proceeding with the superior court action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2, subd. (c) (section 1281.2(c)).) The court ordered the joinder. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to set the order aside. After full briefing and a waiver of oral argument by petitioner, we deny the petition. We publish our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.