Scheller

People v. Scheller

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 4th 1143·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 209·2006 Daily Journal DAR 1964·39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 447
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2006E036402California3,925 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

Defendant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378), unlawful possession of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (c)(1)) and unlawful possession of ammunition (Pen. Code, § 12316, subd. (b)). She contends the trial court erred by allowing the prosecution to introduce her statements to a probation officer.

We decline to decide whether such statements are admissible as a general rule. We will hold, however, that defendant’s statements were inadmissible as substantive evidence of guilt because defendant made the statements in reliance on a plea bargain, and because she was later allowed to withdraw her guilty plea. This error requires us to reverse defendant’s conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm, but not on the other two counts.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In a consent search of the defendant’s hotel room, the police found eight separate containers of methamphetamine, totaling (with packaging) 6.5 grams. They also found two gram scales, almost $2,800 in cash, and a glass methamphetamine pipe. In a tray on a dresser, they found a second glass methamphetamine pipe, two walkie-talkies, one .45-caliber bullet, three…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.