Vessell

People v. Vessell

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 597·36 Cal. App. 4th 285·42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 241·95 Daily Journal DAR 8689·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5091
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 1995B087864California4,121 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nott, J.

This case of first impression presents the question of whether the “three strikes” law prevents a trial judge from sentencing a “wobbler” as a misdemeanor. We hold that it does not.

The People appeal from a judgment entered following respondent Kenneth Lester Vessell’s no contest plea to a charge that he violated Penal Code section 273.5, subdivision (a), after he punched his girlfriend and pushed her against a wall during an argument on April 23, 1994. Under the provisions of section 17, subdivision (b), the trial court reduced the crime to a misdemeanor, imposed sentence, and granted probation. We affirm.

Contentions

The People urge that (1) they have the right to appeal from the imposition of an unlawful sentence; (2) section 17 conflicts with the legislative intent of section 667; (3) by requiring a state prison term, section 667 has restricted the trial court’s power to impose a misdemeanor sentence; (4) the Legislature has the power to restrict the application of section 17; and (5) the trial court improperly engaged in plea bargaining.

Procedural Background

Respondent was charged with a violation of section 273.5, subdivision (a), which is punishable either as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.