Staffpro, Inc. v. Elite Show Services, Inc.

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 4th 1392·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 235·2006 Daily Journal DAR 2239·39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 682·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1610
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2006D045755California6,271 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

A plaintiff in a malicious prosecution action must demonstrate that the litigation alleged to have been maliciously prosecuted was pursued to a legal termination in the plaintiff’s favor. The primary issue in this appeal is whether this “favorable termination” element can be established where a plaintiff prevailed on some, but not all, of the causes of action asserted against it in the complaint in the underlying litigation. We conclude that in such circumstances, a plaintiff cannot establish favorable termination and is consequently precluded from maintaining a subsequent malicious prosecution action.

FACTS

In the instant malicious prosecution action, StaffPro, Inc. contends that it was the victim of a meritless civil action, maliciously prosecuted by Elite Show Services, Inc. The relevant facts are as follows:

StaffPro and Elite are competitors in the event-staffing industry. In May 2001, Elite filed suit against StafiPro and two other unrelated defendants in superior court. Elite’s complaint (the Complaint) alleged that StafiPro was engaging in unlawful practices designed to “artificially lower [StafiPro’s] cost of labor and to diminish or destroy competition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.