Pruyn

Pruyn v. Agricultural Insurance

Bad Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 617·36 Cal. App. 4th 500·42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 295·95 Daily Journal DAR 9041·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5176
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1995B073235California12,391 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Wilhelmina B. Pruyn (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment which dismissed her complaint brought against multiple insurance companies under the “direct action” provisions of the Insurance Code. (Ins. Code, § 11580, subd. (b)(2).) The trial court sustained the objections to plaintiff’s pleading by the defendant and respondent insurers without leave to amend.

Plaintiff filed this action against the defendant insurers to enforce a stipulated judgment entered in her favor after she had settled a claim for damages which she had previously asserted in the underlying action against the insured Rolling Hills Community Association of Rancho Palos Verdes (RHCA). The settlement included a covenant not to execute on the judgment against RHCA. The defendant insurers contend that such a judgment may not be enforced against them as a matter of law.

We disagree and hold that when, as plaintiff alleges happened here, a liability insurer wrongfully denies coverage or refuses to provide a defense, then the insured is free to negotiate the best possible settlement consistent with his or her interests, including a stipulated judgment accompanied by a covenant not to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.