Bradley

Bradley v. CAL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

Caution
158 Cal. App. 4th 1612·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 78·71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 222·102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1016
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 2008F049541California8,080 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiseman, J.

In this appeal the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (formerly the California Department of Corrections) (hereafter CDC) contends that Sallie Mae Bradley, an individual temporarily working at a California prison as a licensed clinical social worker and placed at the prison pursuant to a contract with the National Medical Registry, is not entitled to the protections afforded by California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code section 12940 et seq. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that Bradley is an employee within the meaning of the FEHA, even though she is not an official employee of the state for civil service and benefit purposes. We also hold that, regardless of the size of the state bureaucracy and the due process protections given state employees, CDC had a duty to act immediately to stop the sexual harassment directed at Bradley by a coworker and to ensure that no further harassment occurred. Referring the matter to a lengthy and complicated investigative process alone is insufficient to comply with the protections mandated by the FEHA when continued contact with the harasser leads to further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.