Abrams

People v. Abrams

Good Law
158 Cal. App. 4th 396·69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 742
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 2007B194835California3,879 words

Opinion

Opinion

California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director, and Ronnie

Duberstein, Staff Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Keith H. Borjon and Sharlene A. Honnaka, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

RUBIN, J.

Defendant Lonell Abrams appeals his state prison sentence following revocation of probation on a charge of petty theft with prior convictions. Defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing hearsay evidence to prove his failure to comply with probation obligations. We hold that whether or not a defendant has reported to his probation officer or made monetary payments to the officer are essentially non-testimonial; thus, even if hearsay, they are admissible at a probation violation hearing. Because the trial court properly considered this evidence here, we affirm the order revoking probation.

As defendant's only claim arises from the trial court's revocation of probation, we need not detail the circumstances of the underlying crime. Suffice it to say, defendant pled guilty to one count of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.