Fiscal

Fiscal v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
158 Cal. App. 4th 895·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 21·70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 324
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 2008Al 15018California9,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ruvolo, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

In 2005, the voters of the City and County of San Francisco (City), a home rule charter city, passed Proposition H, a local ordinance prohibiting (1) virtually all City residents from possessing handguns; and (2) all City residents, without exception, from selling, distributing, transferring and manufacturing firearms and ammunition. A legal challenge to the ordinance resulted in the trial court holding that key aspects of the ordinance were preempted by state law. Based on its further determination that the invalid portions of the ordinance were not severable from the arguably valid portions, the court found that the ordinance was preempted in its entirety. Lastly, the trial court held that the City’s home rule power under the California Constitution, article XI, section 5, subdivision (a) (municipal home rule for charter cities) did not override state preemption because the field being regulated was one of statewide, rather than local, concern. We agree with the trial court’s conclusions, and affirm the judgment in all respects.

H.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This appeal concerns Proposition H (Prop. H or ordinance), a municipal ordinance enacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.