National Labor Relations Board v. Flotill Products, Inc.

180 F.2d 441 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. FLOTILL PRODUCTS, INC. (INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS, OF AMERICA, AFL, et al. Intervenors.) No. 11449. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Feb. 24, 1950. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Paul St.Sure, Edward H. Moore, Oakland, Cal., Jefferson E. Peyser, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Tobriner & Lazarus, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenors. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and POPE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. 1 This is a proceeding upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order issued August 19, 1946 against respondent (hereafter called Flotill). 2 The case represents a segment of the inter-union strife which plagued the California canning and processing industry in the earlier '50's. In 1940 the AFL entered into a Master bargaining agreement with California Processors & Growers, Inc., the dominant trade association in that industry for the California area. Flotill, although not a member of the…