National Labor Relations Board v. C. W. Hume Co.

180 F.2d 445 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. C. W. HUME CO. et al. (INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, A.F.L. et al. Intervenors). No. 11693. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Feb. 24, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 31, 1950. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Attorney, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Paul St. Sure and Edward H. Moore, Oakland, Cal., for respondent. Tobriner & Lazarus, Mathew O. Tobriner and Stanley Neyhart, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenors. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and POPE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. 1 This is a companion case to N.L.R.B. v. Flotill Products, Inc., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 441 . The general background of the two cases is identical but there are material differences in matters of detail. 2 Unlike Flotill, respondent Hume Company was a member of the California Processors & Growers, Inc., hence its bargaining relations with the AFL, prior at any rate to March 1946, were governed entirely by the Master agreement long in effect between the associated employers and that union. Under the…