National Labor Relations Board v. Scientific Nutrition Corporation

180 F.2d 447 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION CORPORATION (INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, A.F.L., et al. (Intervenors). No. 11,694. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Feb. 24, 1950. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Attorney, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Paul St. Sure and Edward H. Moore, Oakland, Cal., for respondent. Tobriner & Lazarus, Mathew O. Tobriner and Stanley Neyhart, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenors. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and POPE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. 1 This case is in certain aspects a companion case to N.L.R.B. v. C. W. Hume Co., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 445 , and N.L.R.B. v. Flotill Products, Inc., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 441 . 2 The respondent, Scientific Nutrition Corporation, carried on its cannery business under the name of its predecessor Capolino Packing Corporation, and will be referred to in this opinion as Capolino. In 1941 Capolino entered into a collective bargaining agreement with Cannery Workers Union Local 22382, a local affiliated directly with the American…