Neman

Neman v. Commercial Capital Bank

Good Law
173 Cal. App. 4th 645·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 633·92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 800
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2009B208164California2,919 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1989, Congress enacted the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, which is often referred to by the acronym FIRREA, and is codified at title 12 United States Code section 1821 (d) (the act). The act was designed to provide for takeovers of failed federally insured banking institutions. And the act was designed to provide a smooth mechanism for the rehabilitation and disposal of claims against such institutions. (Yeomalakis v. F.D.I.C. (1st Cir. 2009) 562 F.3d 56, 60 ; Marquis v. F.D.I.C. (1st Cir. 1992) 965 F.2d 1148 , 1154.) As will be noted, the act created an administrative review process for the resolution of claims against a failed bank. Here, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as the receiver for defendant, Washington Mutual Bank as the successor to Commercial Capital Bank, FSB, has moved to dismiss or further stay the appeal of plaintiff, Tony Neman. We conclude the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has presented no basis to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal. But we agree with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation it is entitled to a stay of the appeal pending completion of the 180-day time period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.