In Re Estate of Earley

Good Law
173 Cal. App. 4th 369·92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 577
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2009B209782California2,420 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mallano, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 371 OPINION In this probate case, an heir of a decedent's estate sought and obtained an order appointing her administrator of the estate and determining that the decedent died intestate. The administrator later found a holographic will of the decedent. More than five months after the determination of intestacy and more than three months after discovering the will, the administrator filed a petition to admit the will to probate. The trial court denied the petition on the ground it was untimely. The administrator appealed. *Page 372 We agree that the petition for probate of the will was untimely and affirm. I BACKGROUND On May 8, 2007, James Peter Earley died, leaving an estate valued at around $1.25 million. On July 31, 2007, Kathleen Anderson, Earley's first cousin, filed a petition in the trial court, seeking letters of administration. Anderson also filed an heirship declaration, stating she was the sole beneficiary of the estate. Notice of the petition was by publication. On August 17, 2007, Anderson filed a notice of the petition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.