In Re Sport Shack

Good Law
383 F. Supp. 37·15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1139
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 19744-72-0429 ACWCalifornia1,546 words

Opinion

Opinion

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

Raven Industries, Incorporated (Claimant) and the Trustee in Bankruptcy, both appeal from the order of the Referee in Bankruptcy, filed September 27, 1973, finding that Raven had failed to perfect a security interest in certain property Raven had sold to Sport Shack, a corporation which subsequently entered into bankruptcy proceedings.

Raven sought to perfect a security interest in certain goods it sold to Sport Shack by filing a Financing Statement as required by California Commercial Code Section 9402. The Trustee claims the Statement filed by Raven is deficient in four respects [1] and that, accordingly, Raven has failed to perfect a security interest in the property. Raven claims its asserted security interest is valid because it filed a Financing Statement in substantial compliance with Section 9402, which specifies the necessary contents of such a statement. The Referee in Bankruptcy was unpersuaded by three of the four alleged defects, but nevertheless, found the security interest defective because Raven failed to comply with Section 9402 in one respect. [2] Both parties have appealed the Referee's decision. The question before this Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.