Fries

Fries v. Rite Aid Corp.

Good Law
173 Cal. App. 4th 182·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 590·92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 523
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2009A120488California2,160 words

Opinion

Opinion

Siggins, J.

Must a defendant who seeks costs after a plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal file a proposed judgment in addition to its memorandum of costs? We conclude that there is no legal requirement that a defendant file a proposed judgment. The trial court correctly denied plaintiff Jacquelyn Fries’s motion to tax or strike costs, and we affirm the order and judgment awarding costs. However, we reverse two discovery orders issued after the case was dismissed because they were void due to the trial court’s lack of jurisdiction.

BACKGROUND

Fries, a minor, filed this action against Rite Aid Corporation and Richard Green through her guardian ad litem. The complaint alleged that Green, a Rite Aid security guard, detained and sexually molested Fries under the pretext that he was investigating a shoplifting incident.

On September 4, 2007, Fries filed a request for dismissal of the entire action without prejudice. She filed and served notice of entry of dismissal on September 10, 2007. On September 10 and September 12, 2007, Rite Aid and Green filed their respective memoranda of costs. Fries responded with a motion to strike or tax costs, in which she argued the memoranda of costs were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.