Lopez

Lopez v. Superior Court

Good Law
173 Cal. App. 4th 266·92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 560
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 23, 2009G040679California4,925 words

Opinion

Opinion

Michael A. Ramos, District Attorney, Grover D. Merritt and Grace B. Parsons, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.

Petitioner Daniel Lopez seeks a writ of mandate directing the superior court (1) to vacate its order denying his motion to dismiss the People's petition under Penal Code section 2970, and (2) to address the merits of his motion to dismiss. [1] The People's section 2970 petition sought to extend Lopez's commitment to a state hospital as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) for an additional year. Lopez's motion to dismiss the petition argued he was not an MDO because his underlying crime did not involve force or violence as required under section 2962. We deny Lopez's petition for a writ of mandate because his challenge to his original certification as an MDO is untimely.

On December 26, 2002, Lopez attempted to rob a Laundromat patron. As the victim attempted to enter the Laundromat, Lopez approached him demanding "whatever change he had in his pocket." When the victim said he had no change "and to leave him alone," Lopez stated, "I know you got some change for me, give me your change." The victim replied, "I don't have change for you,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.