James

James v. St. Elizabeth Community Hospital

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1161·30 Cal. App. 4th 73·35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 372·94 Daily Journal DAR 16146·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8774
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 1994C017726California3,083 words

Opinion

Opinion

Davis, J.

In this medical malpractice case arising out of an emergency room visit, plaintiff Kay James appeals from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendants St. Elizabeth Community Hospital and Christopher Louisell, M.D. Nonsuit was granted after plaintiff’s expert was deemed unqualified to testify under Health and Safety Code section 1799.110, subdivision (c). (All further undesignated section references are to the Health and Safety Code.) Section 1799.110, subdivision (c) states: “(c) In any action for damages involving a claim of negligence against a physician and surgeon providing emergency medical coverage for a general acute care hospital emergency department, the court shall admit expert medical testimony only from physicians and surgeons who have had substantial professional experience within the last five years while assigned to provide emergency medical coverage in a general acute care hospital emergency department. For purposes of this section, ‘substantial professional experience’ shall be determined by the custom and practice of the manner in which emergency medical coverage is provided in general acute care hospital emergency departments in the same or similar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.