In Re Krystle D.

Good Law
30 Cal. App. 4th 1778·37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 132
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1994H011538California10,782 words

Opinion

Opinion

George Kennedy, District Attorney, and Robert Masterson, Deputy District Attorney, for Minor.

OPINION

PREMO, Acting P.J.

After Brenda B.'s parental rights to her daughter Krystle D. were terminated, she and her former husband, Krystle's former stepfather, John U., separately appeal. Brenda asserts that the proceedings were defective for lack of proper notice to her tribe under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 United States Code section 1901 et seq. (hereafter, the Act). John contends that the court erred in denying him standing and de facto parent status.

Krystle was born on February 1, 1987, to Brenda, who became an enrolled member of the Kodiak Area Native Association (hereafter, the Tribe) in 1992. Krystle's alleged father, Alfredo D., is of Mexican descent. Krystle is one-eighth Aleut, Caucasian, and Hispanic. When Krystle was born, Brenda was married to and residing with John, although she had had a relationship with Alfredo for approximately a year. Alfredo saw Krystle in the hospital after her birth, but had no contact with her or Brenda thereafter.

For her first year, Krystle lived with Brenda and John, and her half-siblings, Jennifer U., then 10 years old, and Tony…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.