Olson

Olson v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1230·30 Cal. App. 4th 816·35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 897·94 Daily Journal DAR 16998·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9230
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1994A062163California4,833 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reardon, J.

Introduction

This case arises from the failure of the American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida (American Bankers) to pay accident policy benefits after an insured, Phyllis Olson, drowned in a hot tub. Prior to her death, the insured had ingested a quantity of both alcohol and Valium. American Bankers refused payment based upon a policy exclusion for loss caused wholly or in part, directly or indirectly, by intoxicants. After a jury trial, a verdict was returned against the insurance company. American Bankers appealed.

In this appeal, the insurance company asserts several errors, chief among them: (1) whether the presumption of accident instruction given by the trial court was inconsistent with the requirements of the policy; (2) whether the trial court improperly refused to give defendant’s proffered instructions on the definition of “accident”; (3) whether the trial court erred by excluding evidence of a prior warning not to mix alcohol and Valium; and (4) whether the trial court committed error when it instructed that the influence of alcohol had to be the proximate cause of the death.

I. Facts and Procedural History

A. The Drowning

In the afternoon of July 4,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.