Edwards

Bear Creek Master Ass'n v. Edwards

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 4th 1470·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1093·2005 Daily Journal DAR 8432·31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 337·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6187
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 2005E034859, E035284California7,800 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ward, J.

Defendants and appellants Parlan L. Edwards and Gloria Renico Edwards, as trustees of the Parlan L. Edwards and Gloria Renico Edwards Family Trust (the Trust), appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Bear Creek Master Association (Bear Creek), on Bear Creek’s action for breach of contract and foreclosure. Although both Edwardses are named trustees of the trust, the primary actor throughout has been Parlan L. Edwards; for convenience, therefore, we refer to Edwards in the singular, as the representative of the Trust and as the person who performed most of the salient acts on defendants’ behalf.

Edwards and the Trust also appeal postjudgment orders for attorney fees and requiring them to post additional security pending appeal.

The key issue in the appeal is whether a homeowners’ association may charge homeowners’ association dues or assessments for unbuilt property within a planned and partially built homeowners’ association development. The Trust’s parcel was planned for eight condominium units, out of a phase of 16, but none of the units on the Trust’s portion of the property had actually been constructed. This dispute arose because the Trust failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.