Ferris

People v. Ferris

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 4th 773·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1017·2005 Daily Journal DAR 7855·30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 426·5 D.A.R. 7855
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2005F045368California2,167 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

Defendant Timothy Jerry Ferris was convicted of kidnapping, assault with a deadly weapon, attempted criminal threats, and infliction of corporal injury on a spouse. Defendant’s trial included a sanity portion; after the first jury deadlocked on the issue of his insanity, the second jury found he was sane at the time he committed the crimes. He appeals, claiming the United States Supreme Court case of Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [ 147 L.Ed.2d 435 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 ] has altered the burden of proof on the question of insanity, now requiring the People to prove sanity beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, he claims the trial court erred in imposing the aggravated term for his kidnapping conviction because the aggravating factors were not found to be true by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We find both arguments unavailing, publishing our discussion that the People continue to not have the burden to prove sanity.

FACTS

Defendant and his wife Julie were separated. She had filed for divorce and had obtained a restraining order against defendant. On January 15, 2002, as Julie was driving to work, she stopped at a stop sign. Defendant opened the passenger…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.