Terry

Terry v. Slico

Good Law
175 Cal. App. 4th 352·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1022·95 Cal. Rptr. 3d 900
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2009A123310California2,258 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1987.5 provides that “[i]n the case of a subpoena duces tecum which requires appearance and the production of matters and things at the taking of a deposition, the subpoena shall not be valid unless a copy of the affidavit upon which the subpoena is based and the designation of the materials to be produced, as set forth in the subpoena, is attached to the notice of taking the deposition served upon each party or its attorney . . . .” Section 2020.510, subdivision (b), however, provides that “[a] deposition subpoena [that commands the attendance and the testimony of the deponent, as well as the production of business records, documents, or tangible things] need not be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration showing good cause for the production of the documents and things designated.” Commentators have agreed that as between the two contradictory and irreconcilable provisions, the latter, part of the Civil Discovery Act (§ 2016.010 et seq.), controls, but we have found no reported decision to that effect. We agree with the commentators and publish this decision to confirm that view. In doing so, we affirm an order imposing sanctions on a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.