Hirata

People v. Hirata.

Good Law
175 Cal. App. 4th 1499·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1227·96 Cal. Rptr. 3d 918
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2009B212061California3,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

“September Song" laments, “Oh, it’s a long, long while from May to December." June 14 to September 4 is a shorter while. But here it is too long a while.

In an affidavit in support of a search warrant, June 14 is the date that criminal activity is alleged to have occurred. September 4 is the date the search warrant issued. Here we conclude the warrant fails the test of time, and the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply.

The trial court quashed the search warrant because the information contained in the supporting affidavit was stale. It dismissed the case when the People were unable to proceed. The People now appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

On September 4, 2007, police obtained a warrant to search 13 homes and businesses for methamphetamine, cocaine, other controlled substances, drug paraphernalia, cash, and financial records. Derek Hirata’s home was one of the 13 buildings that police were authorized to search. The warrant also authorized police to search nine vehicles and 13 individuals.

In a 53-page supporting affidavit, Police Officer Chad Pfarr stated that he conducted a nine-month investigation of a drug trafficking organization run by Raymond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.