Maystruk

Maystruk v. Infinity Insurance

Good Law
175 Cal. App. 4th 881·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1119·96 Cal. Rptr. 3d 494
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2009B209404California3,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

Suzukawa, J.

This lawsuit concerns Insurance Code section 758.5 (section 758.5), which applies to vehicle repairs performed at a repair shop chosen by the insured. Plaintiff Eugene Maystruk sued defendant Infinity Insurance Company (Infinity) for allegedly violating subdivision (d)(2) of section 758.5, which states that if the insured “elects to have the vehicle repaired at the shop of his or her choice, the insurer shall not limit or discount the reasonable repair costs based on charges that would have been incurred had the vehicle been repaired by the insurer’s chosen shop.” The parties disagree as to whether Infinity’s vehicle repair policy violates subdivision (d)(2) by providing two tiers of coverage: (1) 100 percent coverage for reasonable costs incurred at a facility selected by the insurer; but (2) only 80 percent coverage for reasonable costs incurred at a facility selected by the insured.

The trial court dismissed the complaint after sustaining Infinity’s demurrer without leave to amend. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment on the grounds that (1) the complaint sufficiently alleged or can be amended to allege a violation of section 758.5, subdivision (d)(2); and (2) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.