Buskirk

People v. Buskirk

Good Law
175 Cal. App. 4th 1436·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1218·96 Cal. Rptr. 3d 889
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2009D054757California5,664 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

A jury convicted Nicholas Buskirk of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), but found the attendant firearm use allegation not true (§ 12022.5). Buskirk admitted he had served a prior prison term within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). The trial court sentenced Buskirk to a total prison term of six years.

Buskirk appeals, contending the trial court prejudicially erred in denying his motion to suppress his pretrial statements obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution after he had invoked his right to counsel, in failing to instruct the jurors that a witness was an accomplice as a matter of law, and in failing to advise him of his Boykin-Tahl rights before he admitted his prison prior was true. Buskirk also requests, and the People do not oppose, that this court review the sealed record of the in camera hearing conducted by the trial court regarding the testifying purported accomplice to determine whether any information should have been disclosed which would be relevant to her credibility as a witness and, if so, to permit him to file a supplemental brief on the question of prejudice due to the alleged erroneous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.