Baker Manock Jensen v. the Superior Court

Good Law
175 Cal. App. 4th 1414·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1185·96 Cal. Rptr. 3d 785
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2009F056973California3,713 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

This is a petition seeking relief by writ of mandate after respondent court entered an order disqualifying petitioner Baker Manock & Jensen (hereafter the law firm) from serving as attorneys for any party in the probate action pending before respondent. We will grant the petition and direct respondent to vacate the orders in question.

Facts and Procedural History

The law firm drafted a will duly executed by Lillian Salwasser in 1999. Lillian died on September 24, 2006, and the will was admitted to probate. (Because many of the persons relevant to this proceeding are members of the Salwasser family, we will refer to those persons by their given names for clarity and convenience.) Two of Lillian’s four sons, George and Gary, were named in the will as co-executors of the will. George and Gary were duly appointed executors and were issued letters testamentary with full authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act (Prob. Code, § 10400 et seq.).

George was represented by the law firm. Gary was represented by separate counsel, Michael L. Farley.

Lillian’s will left certain property to her husband, Walter, and left the remainder of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.