Top Cat Productions, Inc. v. Michael's Los Feliz

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 474·125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 553·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4697·2002 Daily Journal DAR 11189·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9930
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2002B153802California1,362 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

A corporate surety issued a preliminary injunction bond based upon an application and promise of indemnity executed by one of several plaintiffs. When the defendants ultimately prevailed and sought judgment on the bond, the surety claimed a right to indemnity against all of the plaintiffs and demanded a judgment in which all of the plaintiffs were made jointly and severally liable with the surety. The trial court rejected the surety’s claim, and the surety now appeals. We conclude, as did the trial court, that the surety’s rights are a matter of contract and that the only plaintiff liable to the surety is the one who applied for the bond. We therefore affirm the judgment.

Background

A.

In the 1990’s, Louise’s Trattoria, Inc., and Top Cat Productions, Inc., leased space in a commercial building owned by Michael’s Los Feliz, L.P. In 1997, Louise’s and Top Cat sued Michael’s for injunctive relief, and a temporary restraining order was issued at their request. The trial court ordered Louise’s and Top Cat to post a $25,000 bond, and a bond was posted. Later, at the request of Louise’s and Top Cat, the trial court issued a preliminary injunction and ordered Louise’s and Top…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.