Muckle

Muckle v. Superior Court

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 218·125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 303·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4659·2002 Daily Journal DAR 10827·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9653
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2002D040086California4,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Andrew Muckle (Andrew) petitions for a writ of mandate commanding respondent court to vacate its order of April 4, 2002, denying his motion to quash service of summons in the action commenced by real party in interest Cassandra Burgess-Muckle (Cassandra) for dissolution of their 11-year marriage, spousal support and property division, or dismiss the action on the ground of inconvenient forum, and to enter a new and different order granting the motion. The question raised is whether, consistent with the due process clause of the United States Constitution, California can exercise personal jurisdiction over Andrew, who has been domiciled in Georgia since December 1998. Based on the record presented, we answer the question in the negative and issue a writ of mandate to prevent the court from exercising such jurisdiction.

Background and Procedure

Andrew and Cassandra met in Georgia, where Andrew lived and worked and Cassandra visited her mother. When Cassandra’s mother died in 1988, she moved into her mother’s house in Georgia, where she resided continuously until marrying Andrew there in 1989. During their 11-year marriage they lived at various times in Georgia and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.