In Re Reeves

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 232·125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 319
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2002G028823California3,011 words

Opinion

Opinion

The Department of Corrections (CDC) appeals the lower court's granting a writ of habeas corpus to inmate, James Greebe Reeves. Reeves was ordered to serve a five-year term in prison concurrent with a 10-year term for two separate cases. Because the five-year term was for a violent felony, the CDC applied Penal Code section 2933.1's [1] limitation on credits to the 10-year aggregate term. The trial court granted Reeves's petition for writ, finding the statute's limitation only applied to the five-year term attributable to the violent felony. We affirm.

A jury convicted Reeves of drug possession with gang enhancements and prior conviction allegations in one case, [2] after he had already entered a guilty plea in another case to assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury with a great bodily injury enhancement as well as admitting the four prior conviction allegations. The plea was conditioned on the prosecution agreeing "to limit [the] max[imum] time on this case to one year [service] consec[utive to the other case]." It was also agreed that the prosecution would dismiss charges of street terrorism and an enhancement that the assault was for the benefit of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.