AMERICAN VANTAGE CO. v. Table Mountain Rancheria

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 954·125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 879
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 2002F038121California2,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rehearing Granted November 1, 2002. See 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 849 .

Appellant, American Vantage Companies, challenges the dismissal of its complaint for breach of contract filed against Table Mountain Rancheria (Table Mountain), a federally recognized Indian tribe. The trial court concluded that the complaint was completely preempted by federal law, specifically the Indian Gaming Regulation Act (IGRA), in that appellant's claims threatened to directly affect or interfere with the tribe's gaming operations.

With respect to the regulation of Indian gaming activity, the IGRA completely preempts state law. However, the contracts at issue here are not, on their face, subject to the IGRA. Rather, only state law claims are involved. Consequently, appellant's complaint does not raise a federal question. Accordingly, the trial court erred in granting Table Mountain's motion to dismiss for lack of state court jurisdiction.

Table Mountain retained appellant, a Nevada corporation, in 1990 to supervise the development and operation of Table Mountain's casino. Between 1990 and 1993, appellant and Table Mountain entered into various management contracts. As a non-Indian contractor,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.