In Re Dannenberg

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 95·125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 458
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 2003A095299California7,161 words

Opinion

Opinion

John E. Dannenberg sought a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court, claiming the Board of Prison Terms (the Board) had illegally denied him parole after a hearing on August 17, 1999. The court issued an order to show cause, held a hearing, and ordered the Board to hold another parole suitability hearing within 30 days. The court directed the Board to set a parole date no later than February 15, 1998, unless there were changed circumstances since the latest parole hearing.

Respondents Dave Hepburn, chairman of the Board, and J.S. Woodford, warden of San Quentin State Prison, have appealed. [1] We have stayed the trial court's order. We agree with the trial court that writ relief was appropriate. However, based on developments in case law after the court's ruling, we hold that the Board must be allowed an opportunity to redetermine the merits of Dannenberg's parole application in the first instance, under the proper legal standards.

The trial court summarized the facts of Dannenberg's offense as follows, based on the probation report: [2]

"By May, 1985, Dannenberg and his wife, victim Linda Dannenberg [footnote omitted] had been undergoing severe domestic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.