Fleishman

Fleishman v. Superior Court

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 350·125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 383·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4673·2002 Daily Journal DAR 11027·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9835
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2002B159487California3,012 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

David M. Fleishman (petitioner), an attorney for Sunterra Corporation (hereafter Sunterra), seeks extraordinary writ review of the trial court’s order denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings in a malicious prosecution action filed against him. Chester Salisbury (Salisbury), a former Sunterra employee, alleges that petitioner maliciously prosecuted an earlier action (hereafter Sunterra’s action) against him. In that action, the trial court granted Sunterra’s application for a preliminary injunction. Petitioner contends that the issuance of the preliminary injunction conclusively establishes that Sunterra’s entire action was brought with probable cause. We agree and order the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate.

Facts and Procedural History

Petitioner filed the Sunterra action in July 1999. The complaint alleged as follows: Salisbury was employed by Sunterra to sell time-share interests in the San Luis Bay Inn (hereafter the Inn). In April 1999 Sunterra terminated his employment. Salisbury thereafter “solicited owners of timeshare interests [in] the . . . Inn ... to sell their timeshare interests using [Salisbury] as broker[] and salesperson[] in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.