Barringer

City of Lincoln v. Barringer

Bad Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 1211·126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 178
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 2002C036184California9,929 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Plaintiff City of Lincoln (the City) initially sought to acquire by eminent domain (Code Civ. Proc., § 1230.010 et seq. ) a portion (Partial Take) of property owned by defendants Donald L. Barringer and Carol S. Barringer (the Barringers). While the eminent domain action was pending, the City adopted a new resolution of necessity and amended its eminent domain complaint, seeking to acquire the remainder of the Barringers’ property interests (Remainder or Remainder Parcel) as a “remnant” (§ 1240.410), in addition to the original Partial Take, such that the City sought to acquire the entire Barringer ownership. The trial court dismissed the eminent domain action as to the Barringers, determining (1) the City failed to give adequate notice of the public hearing; (2) the Remainder of the Barringers’ property was not a “remnant” subject to acquisition along with the Partial Take; and (3) the City abandoned its initial action to condemn only the Partial Take.

On appeal, the City does not challenge the trial court’s rejection of its “remnant” theory and does not seek the entire Barringer ownership. Instead, the City argues it gave adequate notice; it did not abandon • its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.