Bowden

People v. Bowden

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 387·125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 513·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4677·2002 Daily Journal DAR 11113·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9871
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 2002B151167California2,761 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

Appellants James A. Bowden, Antwon L. Tennant, and Vacarro Webster were convicted by jury trial of committing residential burglary, home invasion robbery, and false imprisonment of two of the residents by violence or menace. The jury also made firearm findings, and the court found true that Tennant suffered a prior juvenile court adjudication qualifying as a “strike” under the “Three Strikes” law and also served a prior prison term.

The parties raise numerous contentions. All three appellants contend the trial court inadequately investigated juror misconduct, the evidence is insufficient to show false imprisonment by violence or menace as to the second victim, and the trial court misinstructed the jury in four ways. Tennant raises an individual issue concerning failure to advise him that he had a right to testify. Each appellant raises a sentence issue individual to him, and the Attorney General also asserts the court failed to strike or impose sentence for Tennant’s prior prison term and awarded excess credits to all three appellants. We remand for resentencing of Tennant on his prior prison term and modify the awards of credit to Bowden and Webster.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.