Kelly-Zurian

Kelly-Zurian v. Wohl Shoe Co.

Bad Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 110·22 Cal. App. 4th 397·27 Cal. Rptr. 2d 457·94 Daily Journal DAR 1820·64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,933
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 1994Docket Nos. B054032, B054838California6,458 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

—Defendant and appellant Robert Lawicki (Lawicki) appeals a judgment entered upon a $125,000 jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and appellant Kathleen Joyce Kelly-Zurian (Zurian) in a sexual harassment case. Defendants and appellants Wohl Shoe Company, Shoe Company-Fanfares Shoes Division (Wohl), Lawicki’s former employer, separately appeal, contending Wohl is not liable for Lawicki’s conduct. Zurian also appeals, contending she is entitled to a new trial against Wohl on the issue of punitive damages.

The issues presented include an employer’s liability for sexual harassment by a supervisory employee. Due to Lawicki’s status as a supervisor, Wohl is strictly liable to Zurian in compensatory damages for Lawicki’s misconduct. (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (h)(1).) However, Zurian is not entitled to recover punitive damages against Wohl because Lawicki, although a supervisor, was not a managing agent of Wohl and there was no ratification. (Civ. Code, § 3294, subd. (b); Agarwal v. Johnson (1979) 25 Cal.3d 932, 950 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 141 , 603 P.2d 58 ]; Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 809, 822-823 [ 169 Cal.Rptr. 691 , 620 P.2d 141 ].)

For the reasons discussed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.