Overton

Overton v. Superior Court

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 76·22 Cal. App. 4th 112·27 Cal. Rptr. 2d 274·94 Daily Journal DAR 1304·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 823
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 1994G014877California1,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallin, J.

—Richard Overton petitions for a writ of mandate compelling Superior Court Judge David O. Carter to disqualify himself from further proceedings in Overton’s pending murder case, contending disqualification was mandatory under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6. We grant the petition.

In July 1993 we issued a writ of mandate compelling the trial court to declare a mistrial in Overton’s case and relieve original trial counsel. We found the need to relieve counsel was caused by the conflict which arose when Overton and his counsel traded accusations involving tampering with evidence. During the proceedings on the conflict issue, the trial judge, who is the subject of this proceeding, mentioned the possibility he might take Overton into custody, but he never did so.

Overton sought the writ of mandate after the judge had gone to exceptional lengths to “save” the trial, holding 20 in camera hearings on the status of Overton’s trial counsel, who had been disabled and hospitalized with severe depression. The judge expressed much concern about the tremendous costs a new trial would occasion. We ordered the court to declare the mistrial based upon the extraordinary delay of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.