Robbins

Robbins v. Foothill Nissan

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 197·22 Cal. App. 4th 1769·28 Cal. Rptr. 2d 190·94 Daily Journal DAR 3029·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1716
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1994B070925California7,428 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs, Nelson L. Robbins and Sharon E. Robbins, appeal from an order dismissing their complaint against defendants, Foothill Nissan and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as receiver for Far Western Bank (Far Western) and Atlantic Finance Bank (Atlantic), a division of Far Western, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the published portion of this opinion, we determine that federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over suits which are filed prior to the appointment of the FDIC as the receiver against a banking or other savings institution which is subject to a receivership pursuant to 12 United States Code section 1821 .

II. Background

Present State Court Actions and FDIC Administrative Proceedings

The original complaint was filed on March 16, 1990, and named as defendants: Foothill Nissan; Far Western; Atlantic; Rafael Santiago; and A. C. Hipp. Plaintiffs alleged that they were overcharged for a 1987 Nissan Sentra XE that they purchased from Foothill Nissan. The second amended complaint which is at issue in this case was filed on December 7, 1990, and asserted causes of action for conspiracy and fraud, as well…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.