Gross

Gross v. Allen

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 102·22 Cal. App. 4th 354·27 Cal. Rptr. 2d 429·94 Daily Journal DAR 1738·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1041
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 1994B073286California2,377 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Michael Gross, a psychiatrist, appeals from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Robert Allen, a psychiatrist whose motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied, also appeals.

We find it was error to grant the appealed from motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and reverse that part of the judgment. We also find it was proper to deny Dr. Allen’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and affirm that part of the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Karen Joy Scancarello had a history of depression and attempted suicide. In 1982, her psychotherapist, Dr. Crow, referred her to Drs. Allen and Pitts, psychiatrists who primarily relied on drugs, not psychotherapy, to treat their patients. They prescribed Nardil, Halcion and other drugs for Ms. Scancarello. When this drug treatment proved unsuccessful Drs. Allen and Pitts used electroconvulsive therapy on Ms. Scancarello.

In December 1984, having determined the electroconvulsive therapy was also unsuccessful, Drs. Allen and Pitts had Ms. Scancarello admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital where a cingulotomy was performed. But by the end of December 1984 Ms. Scancarello had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.