Luque

Luque v. Herrera

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 462·2000 Daily Journal DAR 6257·81 Cal. App. 4th 558·96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 853·65 Cal. Comp. Cases 812
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 2000B133525, MC980471California1,393 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

An employee was injured in an automobile accident while driving in the course and scope of his employment. The employee’s attorney obtained a settlement from a third party tortfeasor. The employer’s workers’ compensation reimbursement claim exceeded the amount of the settlement fund. The trial court awarded the employee’s attorney fees out of the settlement fund.

We hold the employee’s attorney is entitled to an award of fees even though the employer participated in the litigation and its reimbursement claim exceeded the amount of the settlement. (Lab. Code, § 3860.)

Facts

Fidel Herrera injured Carmen G. Luque in an automobile accident for which Herrera was solely at fault. At the time of the accident Luque was acting in the course and scope of his employment.

Luque filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits with the Fremont Compensation Insurance Company. Luque also filed an action for damages against Herrera.

Fremont paid $21,670 in compensation benefits to Luque. Fremont filed suit against Herrera for recovery of the compensation benefits paid. Pursuant to stipulation the trial court consolidated Luque’s and Fremont’s cases against Herrera. The consolidated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.