Forecast Homes, Inc. v. Steadfast Insurance

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 200·181 Cal. App. 4th 1466·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 172·2010 WL 95091
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2010G040876California6,207 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Leary, J.

—Housing developers, Forecast Homes, Inc., and K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, Inc. (referred to collectively and in the singular as Forecast), appeals from the judgment entered in its declaratory relief action in favor of Steadfast Insurance Company (Steadfast). Forecast contractually required all its subcontractors to defend and hold it harmless against any liability arising out of the subcontractors’ work. Subcontractors were required to add Forecast to their general liability insurance policies as an additional insured. Several subcontractors obtained their required insurance coverage from Steadfast, who later refused to indemnify Forecast when a lawsuit was filed by several homeowners against Forecast for construction defects. Steadfast maintained the subcontractor did not pay the policy’s self-insured retention (SIR), which was a precondition for coverage. It argued only the named insured, not Forecast, could satisfy the policies’ SIR and trigger coverage. The trial court agreed and concluded the policies were unambiguous, not against public policy, and not illusory. We agree and affirm the judgment.

I

Forecast develops and sells single-family homes. Forecast…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.