Wilson

Wilson v. John Crane, Inc.

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 485·2000 Daily Journal DAR 6541·81 Cal. App. 4th 847·97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 240
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2000A087001California7,974 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs Lois and Daniel Wilson, Sr. following a jury trial on their claims for personal injuries and loss of consortium arising from the latter’s exposure to asbestos. Defendant John Crane, Inc., raises numerous challenges to the judgment. Plaintiffs have cross-appealed from the judgment insofar as it limits their recovery of noneconomic damages to that proportion of such damages as the jury found attributable to defendant. We find no merit in either side’s arguments and affirm the judgment in its entirety.

Background

The parties stipulated at trial that Daniel Wilson was suffering from mesothelioma caused by industrial exposure to asbestos. He testified that from 1955 through 1991, he worked for Arizona Public Service, a public utility, at various power plants. His duties included unpacking and repacking valves, including high-temperature steam valves, and pumps. This sometimes involved chipping out old packing material, which would generate visible dust. He would then apply a small metal brush to the valve seat, followed by an air hose to blow it out, before repacking. The air hose would generate dust from the inside of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.