McClyman

McClyman v. Hamilton

Good Law
180 F.2d 965·1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3534
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 195012183California1,609 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The appellants, as creditors of the alleged bankrupts, filed their involuntary petition in bankruptcy to have declared bankrupt appellee Hamilton and the partnership known as Brunson & Bunch. The case is here on appeal from a judgment of the United States district court dismissing the petition as to Hamilton “both as a member of the partnership of Brunson & Bunch [holding he was not a partner] and individually.” •

It is alleged in the petition that Hamilton is a general partner of Brunson & Bunch; that Hamilton and the firm each are insolvent ; that the petitioners’ claims arose out of. loans to Hamilton and the partnership and are unsecured and fixed as to liability and liquidated as to amount; and that Hamilton and the partnership each had committed several specified acts of bankruptcy, several under 11 U.S.C.A. § 21 , sub. a (2) and one under 11 U.S.C.A. § 21 , sub. a (1).

Separate orders of general reference as to Hamilton individually and as to the partnership were issued. The partnership failed to plead and was adjudged a bankrupt by default prior to the entry of the judgment , here appealed from. Hamilton “for himself alone and none other” responded to the petition by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.