Robertson

Snapp & Associates Insurance Services, Inc. v. Robertson

Good Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 331·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 1228·2002 Daily Journal DAR 2553·96 Cal. App. 4th 884·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2118
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2002D036202California2,137 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Plaintiff Snapp & Associates Insurance Services, Inc. (Snapp), appeals a judgment in favor of defendants Malcolm Bruce Burlingame Robertson and Robertson-Rock Insurance Agency (together Robertson) entered after the trial court determined in a bifurcated trial that its action for conversion and related counts is time-barred. Snapp contends it raised triable issues of fact regarding when it knew or should have known of potential claims against Robertson, and the statutes of limitations were tolled by Robertson’s fraudulent concealment of facts giving rise to claims against him. We affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

In September 1992 Snapp hired Timothy R. Gwin to sell insurance for Snapp, an insurance broker. Under a written agreement, Snapp asserted ownership of 232 client accounts that Timothy R. Gwin brought with him from his previous business, TRG Insurance Agency (the TRG accounts).

In February 1993 Snapp learned that Gwin had deposited commissions earned on the TRG accounts into his own bank account. After Snapp confronted Gwin, he absconded with the TRG account files. Snapp terminated Gwin’s employment on March 1, 1993, after which he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.