Gallant

Costco Companies, Inc. v. Gallant

Good Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 344·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 2203·2002 Daily Journal DAR 2399·96 Cal. App. 4th 740·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1971
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2002D035997California5,758 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

At locations where it shares a parking lot with other retail businesses, the owner of a chain of retail warehouse stores permits expressive activity but only subject to regulations as to time, manner and place. In particular the storeowner prohibits all expressive activity on 34 days on which historically it has experienced a high volume of customer traffic. The owner also prevents any individual or organization from using its property for expressive activity on more than 5 days within any 30-day period (5/30 restriction(s)). The storeowner prohibits all expressive activity at its so-called stand-alone facilities.

The owner’s restrictions on use of its premises are valid. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment which prevents the owner from enforcing its high-volume days and 5/30 restrictions at stores where it shares a parking lot with another retailer, and we affirm that portion of the trial court’s judgment which permits the owner to prohibit all expressive activity at its stand-alone facilities.

Summary

Plaintiff, cross-defendant and appellant Costco Companies, Inc. (Costco), owns and operates a chain of 84 so-called big box…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.