In Re Providian Credit Card Cases

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 833·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 1764·2002 Daily Journal DAR 1971·96 Cal. App. 4th 292·30 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1449
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 2002A094820California6,913 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kay, J.

Rules 243.1 and 243.2 of the California Rules of Court establish the standard and procedures for courts to employ when a request is made to seal a court record that would otherwise be public, or to unseal a record previously ordered sealed. This appeal presents the first opportunity for an examination of these rules and their operation. We conclude that these rules vest a trial court with a considerable amount of discretion in deciding whether to seal or unseal portions of a judicial record. We further conclude, in light of the strong presumption in favor of public access, that the trial court here did not abuse its discretion in deciding to unseal records over an objection that the materials constituted proprietary trade secrets.

Background

It appears from the record that in 1998 and 1999 a number of complaints framed as class actions were filed alleging that defendants Providian Financial Corporation, Providian National Bank, Providian Bank, and Providian Bancorp Services (defendants) had improperly assessed a number of fees and charges to holders of credit cards. The Judicial Council granted a petition to coordinate the actions and designated Judge Stuart Poliak of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.